Rhapsody training feedback 2021

Past performance is a good indicator of future performance so I thought I'd post an order summary of training feedback (best to worst) from last year (all online form responses):

	Training Feedback Question	Score
1	The trainer was knowledgeable about the training topics.	4.982142857
2	The trainer was well prepared.	4.946428571
3	The materials distributed were helpful.	4.839285714
4	Participation and interaction were encouraged.	4.785714286
5	The training objectives were met.	4.669642857
6	The objectives of the training were clearly defined.	4.589285714
7	The context was organised and easy to follow.	4.553571429
8	The meeting room and facilities were adequate and comfortable.	4.464285714
9	This training experience will be useful in my work.	4.455357143
10	The time allocated for the training was sufficient.	4.383928571
11	The topics covered were relevant to me.	4.276785714

This is an accumulated survey of all digital responses last year, multiple courses with no filtering, hence gives a summary of what to expect where topics were scored: 

5 - Strongly agree

4 - Agree

3 - Neutral

2 - Disagree

1 - Strongly disagree

Key things are:

1. Me: I deliver interactive training and I have deep product knowledge and real usage experience.

2. Materials: People seem to value the materials and labs. Labs are very comprehensive, and detailed with screenshots that cover many tool intricacies.

Some more recent feedback to "What did you like most about the training?" were:

• The games and doing the exercises together.
• I liked the sequence of the lab training. I think it helped build our skills to become more independent when creating our own systems. 
• The fact that the instructor walked us through the material, showed how the tool was used, and then we had the chance to do it on our end. This helps confirm if we understood or not as well as improve our familiarity with the tool.
• Presenter was very good at communicating and keeping students engaged.
• It was presented in an easy to follow format and the trainer answered any questions I had along the way.
• Hands-on activities were helpful in understanding the course
• Lots of different training activities (theory, labs, quizzes, workshop)
• Open dialog helped to drive understanding and application of training to current work.
• I liked working through subjects in the tools.  I also liked the Kahoot tests.
• Well organized with live explanation and time to play in Labs.